Clinical Case1
Cautioned extraction to minimize peripheral damage.
Removal of peripheral alveolar inflammation.
Routine implant placement.
Checking the appropriate depth and then performing facile bone augmentation.(Place the fixture mount to prevent the bone material from falling into the implant fixture.)
Using BIOARK, then select appropriate length-1 mm below from marginal soft tissue. With enough endentulous space, BIOARK of usual size 1.5 larger than the fixture platform surface is used (If mesiodistal interference is to be seen, 1 size smaller BIOARK s
Removing the suture after 1 week. Switching to healing abutment after bone regeneration and soft tissue healing.
Clinical Case2
Peri-implantitis induced bone fracture. Vertical bone augmentation is performed with BIOARK. Even with the exposure of significant proportion of implant fixture and the relatively
small pro-portion of implant placed in the bone, utilizing BIOARK presents excellent regeneration result
Clinical Case3
COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDIES I
Healing abutment VS BIOARK
COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDIES II
Titanium Mesh VS BIOARK
OTHER CLINICAL STUDIES I
BIOARK achieving primary stability with maxillary sinus augmentation(Scarce alveolar bone of 1 mm)
OTHER CLINICAL STUDIES II
BIOARK achieving primary stability with maxillary sinus augmentation (Scarce alveolar bone of 1 mm)
OTHER CLINICAL STUDIES III
Strong healing capacity with BIOARK
OTHER CLINICAL STUDIES IV
BIOARK and off-the-rack abutment (immediate placement)